Skip to main content

Website Directories


Top Website Directories to Submit Your Site
Tips to Get your site Listed in Top Website Directories

1.) Top Website Directories to Submit Your Site

Tips to Get your site Listed in the best Web Directories
Getting listed in top web directories can give a huge boost to your business by increasing your link popularity and traffic rate. But the odds here are pretty high and rejections are very common. Given below are some tips which can aid you in getting your sites listed.

2.) Some tips to get your site listed
1.) All top directories are constantly on the look out for websites that can serve as a valuable addition to their database. It becomes obvious that only those sites that look appealing and professional will be added. So make sure that your site is well designed and highly usable.

2.) Most directory editors (editors are those who review submitted sites for possible inclusion in their web directory) make use of the title tags as the heading for a site and give them high importance. Sites that have title tags that do not match with their content/theme are generally rejected. So be sure to provide proper title tags to all your pages and a comprehensive tag to your homepage. The title tag should describe your site in the best possible way.

3.) Sites that have broken links or those which have image loading problems are generally rejected at first glance. These are indications that the site is still under construction and is a major reason for sites geting rejected. To eliminate this problem make sure to check your site for broken links. Check all images and test your site in different browsers to ensure the tables load properly.

4.) Providing proper contact information is extremely important. Contact information should include company name, street address, zip codes, phone numbers, fax numbers and email addresses. One more important fact is that the contact information should match with the one in the WHOIS information of the site. Sites that do not have contact information are generally rejected by all major directories.

5.) Some other details that a site should have include the Copyright information, Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, Return Policy (for product sites), Warranty, Guarantee, Shipping Information etc. All this information must be easily accessible and should have links on the homepage.

In addition to all these factors, it is also extremely important to ensure that the site is listed in a relevant category. Sites submitted in irrelevant categories are likely to be rejected by all major directories.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Consistency of structured citations

A reference is any online say of your organization's halfway or complete name, address, and telephone number (Nap). An "organized reference" alludes to a posting of your business in an online neighborhood professional reference, for example Yp.com, Hotfrog, or Best of the Web. Conflicting references may include: A contrast in the business name (i.e. Grin Dentistry vs. Grin Dental Clinic) A wrong road address, a typo in road address numbers, or a missing suite number A wrong or distinctive telephone number, a toll free or call following number An alternate or wrong site Url Reference inconsistencies may emerge from basic heedlessness throughout the reference building process and these errors might then be copied over the neighborhood seek biological community. Inconsistencies additionally ordinarily go out if a business has moved at whenever in the previous decade or something like that. Separated from initiating perplexity for people, these inconsistencies thw...

February 7th May Have Been A Google Phantom Update

Image Ref: seroundtable.com Google Phantom Update As you probably are aware, we were by a long shot the first to break the news on the February seventh Google refresh that appeared to be huge so enormous that I really requested that Google affirm it which they said no remark. What's more, when Google gives a no remark, that is the place people with bunches of information come in. Glenn Gabe posted his profound investigation of this refresh calling this refresh more like the Panda calculation or Phantom refresh. Note, Google never affirmed any of the Phantom refresh and said they won't affirm future Panda refreshes. So we are left thinking this is presumably one of those or something new, however not identified with connections as I said initially but rather more identified with substance quality. Seek Metrics additionally post examination of this calling this the Phantom 5 refresh. Obviously, they have no real way to affirm it was Phantom since Google wouldn't r...